CASE REPORTS

A Case of Acute Myocardial Infarction due to Coronary Spasm in the Myocardial Bridge

Daisuke Fujibayashi, MD, Yoshihiro Morino, MD, Yuji Ikari, MD, PhD
Daisuke Fujibayashi, MD, Yoshihiro Morino, MD, Yuji Ikari, MD, PhD
Coronary arteries are usually located on the surface of the cardiac muscle. Myocardial bridges have been described in a variable number of autopsy cases ranging from 5.4% to 85.7% of cases examined, depending on the population sampled.1,2 In contrast, identification of myocardial bridging during diagnostic angiography was reported to be between 0.5% and 16% of sampled populations.3,4 The majority of such abnormalities were found in the left anterior descending coronary artery, whereas those in the circumflex or the right coronary artery (RCA) were relatively rare.2 Briefly, a myocardial bridge has been considered a “benign” structural variation since it predominantly compresses a coronary artery in the systolic phase. Because coronary circulation is physiologically dominant in the diastolic phase, segmental compression of coronary arteries by bridging the myocardium is rarely associated with significant myocardial ischemia. However, several clinical studies have shown that myocardial bridging occasionally causes acute myocardial infarction (AMI).5–12 A coronary artery wall surrounded by myocardial bridges is unlikely to be a cause of progressive atherosclerotic plaques; thus, other mechanisms may be at play in the development of acute coronary syndrome besides the common causes like plaque rupture and/or erosion. In this report, we describe a case of AMI in which the culprit lesions were located at sites distal to the RCA within the myocardial bridge, and present the assessments and the relevant angiographic tests to investigate its potential causes.

Case Report. A 68-year-old Japanese man with essential hypertension that had been treated with nifedipine, 10 mg every 12 hours for over 10 years, visited our hospital due to a slight precordialgia that lasted for 8 hours. During the 3 months prior to his admission, precordialgia had occurred once a month for 30–60 seconds in the early morning. There was no episode of exertional chest symptoms. His coronary risk factors included hypertension and smoking (20 cigarettes per day for 40 years). On admission, the electrocardiogram (ECG) showed abnormal Q-wave and ST-segment elevation in inferior wall leads II, III and aVF (Figure 1). A blood test showed a WBC of 13,100/mm3, a GOT of 31 U/l, a GPT of 21 U/l, an LDH of 223 U/l, and myocardial troponin I of 2.18 ng/ml. Creatine kinase (CK) was high, at 216 U/l, and the maximum value was observed at 20 hours after the onset (maximum CK:386 U/l; CK-MB:10.2%). An echocardiogram showed nonobstructive hypertrophy of the interventricular septum at the outflow, with normal chamber size and inferior wall hypokinesis. ST-elevation AMI was diagnosed, and the patient underwent emergency catheterization. However, his chest pain was relieved with nitroglycerin in the catheterization laboratory. Amazingly, there were no stenoses of the coronary arteries, but coronary compression due to the myocardial bridge was observed in the middle of the posterior descending branch. The compression caused 75% stenosis in the systolic phase (Figure 2). A left ventriculogram showed contraction abnormality of the left ventricular inferior wall, where it was identified with the perfused segments downstream of the compression site of the posterior descending branch.
Enhanced heart magnetic resonance imaging showed subendocardial enhancement in the inferior wall, and the T2 weighted image showed a high signal at the same site, which was considered to be myocardial edema caused by infarction (Figure 3).
One week after the first emergency catheterization, we performed a spasm provocation test using intracoronary acetylcholine. Infusion of 20 µg of acetylcholine into the RCA provoked total occlusion in the middle of the posterior descending branch that was identical to the position of the muscle compression. ST-segment elevation was observed in leads II, III and aVF. We confirmed the reproducibility of the phenomenon by a second provocation test using 50 µg of acetylcholine. After infusion of 5 mg of isosorbide dinitrate, coronary spasm disappeared, but the muscle compression was evident (Figure 4). His symptoms did not recur with administration of oral nifedipine (10 mg every 12 hours) and isosorbide mononitrate (20 mg every 12 hours).

Discussion. Here we report a case of AMI at the myocardial bridge that was caused by coronary spasm. The mechanism of ischemia at the myocardial bridge has not been clarified. Recent studies suggest that a high degree of milking effect of the coronary flow induced by the myocardial bridge can be the cause of myocardial ischemia if tachycardia and/or long-distance bridging exist.1,4,12,13 Intimal thickening was observed in intravascular ultrasound in the area of coronary spasm,14 but significant plaques were not found in the bridging area and distal to that area.3,15–17 Recently, a number of cases were reported in which coronary spasm was provoked at the myocardial bridge.5,6,18–20 Coronary spasm is vascular smooth muscle contraction that causes myocardial ischemia. Many factors are considered to participate in the spasm such as endothelial dysfunction, smoking, alcohol, lipid metabolic disorders, gene expression, race, oxidative stress, intimal thickening and decreased nitric oxide (NO).14,21–27 In a porcine model, repeated endothelial denudation can cause coronary spasm.28 Coronary squeezing by a myocardial bridge may cause mechanical endothelial denudation. Therefore, coronary spasm is a conceivable cause of myocardial ischemia at the myocardial bridge.
In terms of treatment for these patients, stent placement or coronary bypass has rendered satisfactory results.29 The recommended medical treatment for the ischemia associated with myocardial bridges is beta-blockers.30 However, if coronary spasm is the cause of ischemia, one should avoid the use of beta-blockers because it is contraindicated for coronary spasm.27 Our patient was successfully stabilized with a calcium antagonist without beta-blockers.
In conclusion, we report a case of AMI due to coronary spasm that coincided with an area of myocardial bridging. A provocation test of coronary spasm should be considered in patients with myocardial ischemia at a myocardial bridge, because it is useful to determine the appropriate medical treatment, which may be a beta-blocker or a calcium antagonist.

 

 

 

References

References

  1. Angelini P, Trivellato M, Donis J, et al. Myocardial bridges: A review. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1983;26:75–88.
  2. Polacek P, Kralove H. Relation of myocardial bridges and loops on the coronary arteries to coronary occlusions. Am Heart J 1961;61:44–52.
  3. Hongo Y, Tada H, Ito K, et al. Augmentation of vessel squeezing at coronary-myocardial bridge by nitroglycerin: Study by quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Am Heart J 1999;138(2 Pt 1):345–350.
  4. Noble J, Bourassa MG, Petitclerc R, et al. Myocardial bridging and milking effect of the left anterior descending coronary artery: Normal variant or obstruction? Am J Cardiol 1976;37:993–999.
  5. Ciampricotti R, el Gamal M. Vasospastic coronary occlusion associated with a myocardial bridge. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1988;14:118–120.
  6. Low AF, Chia BL, Ng WL, et al. Bridge over troubling spasm: Is the association of myocardial bridging and coronary artery spasm a distinct entity? Three case reports. Angiology 2004;55:217–220.
  7. Bestetti RB, Costa RS, Zucolotto S, et al. Fatal outcome associated with autopsy proven myocardial bridging of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Eur Heart J 1989;10:573–576.
  8. Agirbasli M, Martin GS, Stout JB, et al. Myocardial bridge as a cause of thrombus formation and myocardial infarction in a young athlete. Clin Cardiol 1997;20:1032–1036.
  9. Ramos SG, Montenegro AP, Felix PR, et al. Occlusive thrombosis in myocardial bridging. Am Heart J 1993;125:1771–1773.
  10. Vasan RS, Bahl VK, Rajani M. Myocardial infarction associated with a myocardial bridge. Int J Cardiol 1989;25:240–241.
  11. Feldman AM, Baughman KL. Myocardial infarction associated with a myocardial bridge. Am Heart J 1986;111:784–787.
  12. Endo M, Lee YW, Hayashi H, et al. Angiographic evidence of myocardial squeezing accompanying tachyarrhythmia as a possible cause of myocardial infarction. Chest 1978;73:431–433.
  13. Stathaki M, Velidaki A, Koukouraki S, et al. Myocardial bridging in a patient with exertional chest pain. Clin Nucl Med 2005;30:422–424.
  14. Miyao Y, Kugiyama K, Kawano H, et al. Diffuse intimal thickening of coronary arteries in patients with coronary spastic angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:432–437.
  15. Ge J, Jeremias A, Rupp A, et al. New signs characteristic of myocardial bridging demonstrated by intracoronary ultrasound and Doppler. Eur Heart J 1999;20:1707–1716.
  16. Lee SS, Wu TL. The role of the mural coronary artery in prevention of coronary atherosclerosis. Arch Pathol 1972;93:32–35.
  17. Ishii T, Asuwa N, Masuda S, et al. The effects of a myocardial bridge on coronary atherosclerosis and ischaemia. J Pathol 1998;185:4–9.
  18. Kodama K, Morioka N, Hara Y, et al. Coronary vasospasm at the site of myocardial bridge — Report of two cases. Angiology 1998;49:659–663.
  19. Teragawa H, Fukuda Y, Matsuda K, et al. Myocardial bridging increases the risk of coronary spasm. Clin Cardiol 2003;26:377–383.
  20. Shiode N, Kato M, Teragawa H, et al. Vasomotility and nitric oxide bioactivity of the bridging segments of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Am J Cardiol 1998;81:341–343.
  21. Maseri A, Davies G, Hackett D, et al. Coronary artery spasm and vasoconstriction. The case for a distinction. Circulation 1990;81:1983–1991.
  22. Ganz P, Alexander RW. New insights into the cellular mechanisms of vasospasm. Am J Cardiol 1985;56:11E–15E.
  23. Waters DD, Szlachcic J, Bonan R, et al. Comparative sensitivity of exercise, cold pressor and ergonovine testing in provoking attacks of variant angina in patients with active disease. Circulation 1983;67:310–315.
  24. Kaski JC, Crea F, Meran D, et al. Local coronary supersensitivity to diverse vasoconstrictive stimuli in patients with variant angina. Circulation 1986;74:1255–1265.
  25. Kugiyama K, Yasue H, Okumura K, et al. Nitric oxide activity is deficient in spasm arteries of patients with coronary spastic angina. Circulation 1996;94:266–271.
  26. Egashira K, Inou T, Yamada A, et al. Preserved endothelium-dependent vasodilation at the vasospastic site in patients with variant angina. J Clin Invest 1992;89:1047–1052.
  27. Yasue H, Omote S, Takizawa A, et al. Coronary arterial spasm in ischemic heart disease and its pathogenesis. A review. Circ Res 1983;52(2 Pt 2):I147–I152.
  28. Saitoh S, Muto M, Osugi T, et al. Repeated epicardial coronary artery endothelial injuries lead to a global spontaneous coronary artery spasm. Coron Artery Dis 2004;15:137–145.
  29. Klues HG, Schwarz ER, vom Dahl J, et al. Disturbed intracoronary hemodynamics in myocardial bridging: Early normalization by intracoronary stent placement. Circulation 1997;96:2905–2913.
  30. Schwarz ER, Klues HG, vom Dahl J, et al. Functional, angiographic and intracoronary Doppler flow characteristics in symptomatic patients with myocardial bridging: Effect of short-term intravenous beta-blocker medication. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:1637–1645.