Volume 23 - Issue 10 - October 2011
Emergent Versus Elective Percutaneous Stent Implantation in the Unprotected Left Main: Long-Term Outcomes from a Single-Center Registry
- Thu, 9/29/11 - 10:20am
- 0 Comments
- 4763 reads
Abstract: Background. Unprotected left main (ULM) coronary disease is considered by contemporary guidelines a class I indication for surgery. However, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is often carried out in the ULM in either emergent or high-risk elective procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate ULM-PCI as a feasible and safe procedure in the emergent setting, and to analyze outcomes in both scenarios.
Left Main Stenting and Landmark Analysis — Drawing the Line
- Thu, 9/29/11 - 11:05am
- 0 Comments
- 2218 reads
The optimal revascularization strategy for emergent left main coronary artery (LMCA) in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains largely an unresolved issue. The most current ACC/AHA 2009 Focused Update Guidelines assign it a IIb recommendation.1 This carefully adjudicated recommendation stems from the fact that not all LMCA lesions are created equal and outcomes depend among many other considerations on lesion and procedural characteristics, door-to-balloon time, and a myriad of underlying patient comorbidities.
Changes in Radial Artery Volume Assessed Using Intravascular Ultrasound: A Comparison of Two Vasodilator Regimens in Transradial Coronary Interventions
- Thu, 9/29/11 - 11:34am
- 0 Comments
- 3815 reads
Abstract: Objectives. This study used intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to evaluate radial artery volume changes after intra-arterial administration of nitroglycerin and/or verapamil. Background. Radial artery spasm, which is associated with radial artery size, is the main limitation of the transradial approach in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).
Radial Artery Spasm: Pick the Right Cocktail and Relax
- Thu, 9/29/11 - 11:47am
- 0 Comments
- 2182 reads
Many clinicians across the world have adopted the transradial approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).1,2 Reduced vascular complications, early ambulation, patient satisfaction, and reduced procedural costs are among the reasons the transradial approach is becoming increasingly popular.1-6 However, radial artery spasm (RAS) is a common complication of the transradial approach, leading to patient discomfort, procedure failure, and a significant barrier to wide-scale adoption of the technique.7,8
Single-Center Experience of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Using Multi-Electrode Mapping and Ablation Catheters
- Thu, 9/29/11 - 12:44pm
- 0 Comments
- 5118 reads
Abstract: Purpose. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an established therapy for the treatment of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Many techniques have been reported to achieve RFA. We report a single-center experience of RFA using three multi-electrode catheters. Methods. We collected data of the patients who had RFA for AF using custom-designed multi-electrode mapping and ablation catheters between May 2007 and November 2009 at this center.
Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Do the Newer Tools Help?
- Thu, 9/29/11 - 1:01pm
- 0 Comments
- 1770 reads
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent sustained cardiac arrhythmia, increasing in occurrence with age. Based on recent epidemiology, it is estimated to affect 6.1 million Americans, and this number is likely to increase to 15.9 million by 2050.1 Partly because of the limitations of antiarrhythmic medications, catheter ablation has come into common use for clinical treatment of atrial fibrillation.
High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with the Tandem Heart and Impella Devices: A Single-Center Experience
- Thu, 9/29/11 - 2:42pm
- 0 Comments
- 5119 reads
Abstract: Background. Intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABPs) are indicated during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI) to reduce major procedural complications. The clinical utility of the newer Impella and TandemHeart devices is not clear. This study determined the baseline characteristics, hemodynamics, and outcomes of patients treated with prophylactic percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (PLVADs) during HR-PCI.
What is High-Risk PCI, and How Do You Safely Perform It?
- Thu, 9/29/11 - 3:11pm
- 0 Comments
- 2653 reads
You can liken performance of high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to attempting to repair a damaged car engine while it is turned on. Moreover, that car is trying to slowly drive away from a steep cliff with the ocean crashing at its base. If you can’t repair the engine, the car will stall and will slide backward and over the cliff into the ocean. Although slightly melodramatic, this analogy does summarize the consequences of failure after high-risk PCI.
- « Previous
- | Page 1 of 3 |
- Next »







