Volume 14 - Issue 9 - September, 2002

Integrating GP IIb/IIIa Inhibition into Treatment Strategies for Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (PART I)

Overview. Against the background of established clinical benefit in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and elective percutaneous revascularization, recent trials examining the role of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibition in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have been based on the rationale that effective platelet inhibition is fundamental to reperfusion strategies designed to restore myocardial perfusion, limit infarct size, and improve survival.
Despite advances in the care of high-risk patients with acute ST-elevation MI, limitations of current standard therapie



Integrating GP IIb/IIIa Inhibition into Treatment Strategies for Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Part II)

“Facilitated fibrinolysis”: GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and fibrinolytic therapy in ST-elevation infarction. Considering the abundant platelet-rich thrombus present in almost all patients with acute myocardial infarction, it is intuitive that platelet inhibition with GP IIb/IIIa antagonists may be effective in this syndrome. In addition to their antiplatelet effects; however, GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors also augment intrinsic fibrinolysis, establishing a dual role for their application in acute myocardial infarction. GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors independently exhibit some intrinsic clot-dissolving



Preventing Restenosis with Stent Drug Coatings

Uncertainties with Drug-Eluting Stents

Percutaneous coronary revascularization is a worldwide accepted technique as part of the treatment of coronary artery disease. Despite the use of stents, restenosis continues to be the major limitation of this modality, that ranges from 10–30%, depending on the patients and lesion characteristics. Recently, drug-eluting stents appeared in the field as one of the most promising tools in order to decrease and perhaps abolish the restenosis process. The recently reported results of the RAVEL trial show an astonishing 0% restenosis rate in the dr



Sidebranch Occlusion After Coronary Stenting With or Without Balloon Predilation: Direct Versus Conventional Stenting

Sidebranch occlusion (SBO) is a challenging problem during interventional procedures.1–5 Although occlusion of branches smaller than 2 mm was reported to be of little clinical importance, this may lead to angina or myocardial infarction. Sidebranches with ostial lesions were observed to occlude more than the ones without any lesion. Plaque shift, plaque embolization, spasm, thrombus formation, design of the stent struts and high-pressure balloon predilation (> 10 atm) are reported to be the mechanisms responsible for SBO.6,7
Direct stenting (DS; stenting without balloon predilation) is a no



Editor's Message (September 2002)

Dear Readers,

This issue of the Journal of Invasive Cardiology includes original research articles, case reports, and articles from the Journal special sections “Acute Coronary Syndromes”, “Clinical Decision Making”, “The Electrophysiology Corner” and “Interventional Pediatric Cardiology”, and a the session IV discussion from this year’s International Andreas Gruentzig Society Meeting.

The first research article, from Dr. Timur Timurkaynak and associates from the Department of Cardiology at the Gazi University Medical School in Ankara, Turkey, compares the incidence of



Sidebranch Patency During Main Branch Stenting: Try to Keep the Branch Open Immediate and Long-Term!

The study presented by Timurkaynak et al. in this issue of the Journal discusses a contemporary topic, which is direct stenting.1 It is interesting that the evaluation of this technique is performed in the setting of coronary bifurcations or in the presence of a sidebranch (> 1 mm) at the site of the lesion. The authors included 151 patients with 185 sidebranches in this report originating at the level of the lesion. Eighty-eight patients (110 sidebranches) underwent direct stenting, while 63 patients (75 sidebranches) underwent stenting with balloon predilatation (conventional stenting). The



Anterior Ischemia Secondary to Embolization of the Posterior Descending Artery in a Patient with a Chronic Total Occlusion of th

Case Description. A 45-year-old man with a history of coronary artery disease presented to the Emergency Room of a community hospital with chest discomfort. He reported the onset of intense retrosternal chest pressure with radiation to both arms, associated with shortness of breath and diaphoresis. This discomfort was precipitated by intense manual labor, but was not relieved by rest. He experienced minimal relief from sublingual nitroglycerin administered in the ambulance. He was evaluated and treated with aspirin, heparin, and intravenous nitroglycerin. His electrocardiogram was reportedly



Optimization of Local Methylprednisolone Delivery to Inhibit Inflammatory Reaction and Neointimal Hyperplasia of Coated Coronary

Metallic coronary stents have shown to be essential in the treatment of (sub)acute vessel closure after balloon angioplasty and multicenter randomized trials have shown a decreased restenosis rate in selected patient subgroups compared to conventional balloon angioplasty. However, in-stent restenosis caused by an increased neointimal hyperplasia remains the major limitation of coronary stents.1,2 Restenosis is related to vessel injury caused by stent implantation and foreign body response induced by stenting, resulting in thrombosis, inflammation, dedifferentiation, migration and proliferation



  • « Previous
  •  | Page 1 of 3 | 
  • Next »