Managing Unstable Angina in High-Risk Patients (Part II)

Author(s): 

Derek P. Chew, MBBS and David J. Moliterno, MD

Continued from previous page

PURSUIT. The PURSUIT trial was designed to evaluate eptifibatide as an adjunct to a broad spectrum of management strategies used to prevent death and MI in the 30 days following an urgent episode of UA or NQWMI. The 10,948 patients enrolled in PURSUIT experienced chest pain at rest (lasting >= 10 minutes) within the previous 24 hours and had one or more ECG or cardiac enzyme (CK-MB) test results confirming a diagnosis of UA or NQWMI.58

Patients were randomized to receive eptifibatide 180 µg/kg bolus plus 1.3 µg/kg/min infusion, eptifibatide 180 µg/kg bolus plus 2.0 µg/kg/min infusion, or placebo bolus plus infusion. The primary endpoint was death from any cause and nonfatal MI over the 30 days following initiation of drug therapy. Prospectively defined secondary endpoints included death or MI at 96 hours and 7 days; all-cause mortality within 30 days; first or recurrent MI within 30 days; and safety and efficacy in the subset of patients undergoing PTCA. Safety endpoints included bleeding complications, incidence of stroke and incidence of thrombocytopenia.58

Treatment with eptifibatide was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the composite primary endpoint at 30 days (15.7% placebo versus 14.2% eptifibatide; p = 0.04), and this benefit also was seen in the composite rates of death or MI at 96 hours (9.1% placebo versus 7.6% eptifibatide; p = 0.01) and 7 days (11.6% placebo versus 10.1% eptifibatide; p = 0.02).58

Major bleeding occurred in 10.6% and 9.1% of eptifibatide and placebo patients, respectively (p = 0.02), and approximately 80% of the major bleeding complications occurred in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Minor bleeding occurred more frequently in eptifibatide versus placebo patients (12.9% versus 7.4%, respectively), but in most cases bleeding was mild and occurred at the femoral access site. Strokes occurred with similar frequency in the two study groups (0.7% eptifibatide versus 0.8% placebo), as did the incidence of thrombocytopenia (6.8% versus 6.7%, respectively). Intracranial bleeding was rare, occurring in less than 0.1% of patients in both study groups.58 In a sub-analysis of the 1,228 patients undergoing PCI within 72 hours of randomization in the PURSUIT trial, eptifibatide was associated with a 31% RR reduction in 30-day death or MI (11.6% eptifibatide versus 16.7% placebo; p = 0.01). Among patients undergoing PCI after 72 hours and before 30 days, a marginal difference in the 30-day rate of death or MI was observed (14.6% eptifibatide versus 15.6% placebo; p = 0.23). These data support the concept that benefit with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors is of greater magnitude when associated with an early invasive approach.64

PRISM. The Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic Syndrome Management (PRISM) trial examined whether inhibition of platelet aggregation with tirofiban would improve clinical outcome in patients with unstable angina. This double-blind study randomly assigned 3,232 patients who were already receiving aspirin (300–325 mg/day) to additional treatment with either intravenous tirofiban (0.6 µg/kg body weight/minute for 30 minutes followed by 0.15 µg/kg/min) or heparin (5,000 U intravenous bolus followed by 1,000 U/hour infusion) for 48 hours. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, MI or refractory ischemia at 48 hours.65

At 48 hours, the incidence of the composite endpoint was decreased by 32% in the group that received tirofiban (3.8% tirofiban versus 5.6% heparin; p = 0.01). At 30 days, the frequency of the composite endpoint (including patients readmitted for UA) was similar in the two groups (15.9% tirofiban versus 17.1% heparin; p = 0.34). A trend toward a reduction in the rate of death or MI was observed in the tirofiban group (5.8% tirofiban versus 7.1% heparin; p = 0.11). Patients in the tirofiban group also had a lower mortality rate (2.3% tirofiban versus 3.6% heparin; p = 0.02). Major bleeding occurred in 0.4% of the patients in both groups, but reversible thrombocytopenia occurred more frequently with tirofiban than with heparin (1.1% versus 0.4%; p = 0.04).65

Tirofiban was generally well tolerated and, compared with heparin, reduced ischemic events during the 48-hour infusion period, during which revascularization procedures were not performed. The incidence of refractory ischemia and MI was not significantly reduced at 30 days, but mortality was lower among the patients given tirofiban.65

PRISM-PLUS. PRISM-PLUS was a double-blind study that randomized 1,915 patients with UA or NQWMI to receive tirofiban alone, heparin alone, or tirofiban plus heparin.59 Study drugs were infused for a mean (± standard deviation) of 71.3 ± 20 hours, during which coronary angiography and angioplasty were performed, when indicated, after 48 hours. The primary endpoint was the composite of death, MI or refractory ischemia within 7 days following randomization.59

The group receiving tirofiban alone was stopped prematurely because of excess mortality at 7 days (4.6% tirofiban alone versus 1.1% heparin alone). The frequency of the composite primary endpoint at 7 days was lower among patients who received tirofiban plus heparin than among those who received heparin alone (12.9% tirofiban-heparin versus 17.9% heparin; p = 0.004).59 The frequency of the composite endpoint in the tirofiban-plus-heparin group was also lower than the heparin-only group at 30 days (18.5% versus 22.3% respectively; p = 0.03) and at 6 months (27.7% versus 32.1%, respectively; p = 0.02). At 7 days, the frequency of death or MI was 4.9% in the tirofiban-plus-heparin group versus 8.3% in the heparin-only group (p = 0.006). At 30 days, the frequency of death or myocardial infarction was 8.7% and 11.9%, respectively (p = 0.03), and at 6 months was 12.3% and 15.3%, respectively (p = 0.06).59 The therapeutic benefit was consistent in the various subgroups of patients (males and females, younger and older patients, those taking aspirin and those not taking aspirin, and those taking heparin and those not taking heparin) and in those treated medically as well as those treated with angioplasty. Major bleeding occurred in 3.0% of the patients receiving heparin alone and 4.0% of those receiving tirofiban plus heparin (p = 0.34). No patient experienced intracerebral hemorrhage or died from a bleeding complication related to a study drug.59

PARAGON-B. Platelet IIb/IIIa Antagonism for the Reduction of Acute Coronary Syndrome Events in a Global Organization Network (PARAGON-B) was a randomized, double-blind study designed to assess the efficacy of lamifiban in improving patient outcomes when dosed according to creatinine clearance (target, 20–40 ng/ml). The 5,228 patients with non-ST elevation ACS enrolled in this multinational trial were randomized to receive either lamifiban (500 µg intravenous bolus and infusion of 1.0, 1.5 or 2.0 µg/min) for 72 hours or placebo bolus plus infusion. The primary endpoint of this study was the 30-day composite of death, MI and severe recurrent ischemia requiring urgent revascularization. Secondary endpoints included the composite and its components at 7, 30 and 180 days; death at 1 year; and the incidence of major and minor bleeding.66 Preliminary results failed to demonstrate any statistically significant reduction in the composite primary endpoint or in any of its individual components in the patients treated with lamifiban compared to those who receive placebo. The published results are expected to be available this year.67

As shown in a recent report on the PARAGON-B troponin-T substudy of 1,160 patients in the PARAGON-B trial, investigators obtained troponin T levels before treatment began and 24 and 72 hours later. At baseline, 40.2% of patients were troponin-T positive (>= 0.1 ng/mL). Patients who were positive at baseline had a significantly higher rate of the primary endpoint at 30 days than those who were troponin-negative (odds ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1–2.1). Patients who were troponin-T positive and treated with lamifiban had a significant reduction in the primary endpoint (19.4% placebo versus 11.0 lamifiban; p = 0.01). However, this treatment benefit did not extend to patients who were troponin-T negative (11.2% placebo versus 10.8% lamifiban; p = 0.86). This pattern was similar for the secondary endpoints of death alone or death or MI at 30 days. These findings suggest that the presence of elevated troponin T predicts poor short-term outcomes in non-ST segment elevation ACS.68 Similar observations have been made in the PRISM65 and CAPTURE57 studies.

GUSTO-IV-ACS. This trial was designed to evaluate the effect of abciximab on reducing the composite endpoint of death or MI by 30 days in patients with non-ST segment elevation ACS who were not undergoing early revascularization. The inclusion criteria for the trial were angina at rest >= 5 minutes within the preceding 24 hours, ST-segment depression >= 0.5 mm, and/or troponin I or T positivity. All patients received aspirin and unfractionated heparin (UFH) or dalteparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), and were randomized to placebo or standard-dose abciximab for either 24 or 48 hours. Of the 7,800 patients in this trial, 2,598 received placebo, 2,590 received abciximab for 24 hours, and 2,612 received abciximab for 48 hours.69

No significant differences were found in reductions of death or AMI at 30 days among the three patient groups (placebo, 8.0%; abciximab 24 hours, 8.2%; abciximab 48 hours, 9.1%). However, rates of adverse effects (stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, bleeding, transfusion or low platelets) were low and comparable in the three treatment groups.69

The investigators concluded that in patients with ST-segment depression or troponin-positive ACS, treatment with abciximab for 24 or 48 hours with adjunctive aspirin and UFH or LMWH, and without early intervention, did not reduce death or MI. There are several possible explanations for these results. First, the trial may have been underpowered; although GUSTO-IV-ACS was 80% powered to show an anticipated 20% reduction in clinical event rates, the overall event rate of 8% was lower than the expected 11% rate, yielding only 58% power, not enough to show a 20% reduction. Second, it is possible that prolonged (24- or 48-hour) platelet inhibition with a GP IIb/IIIa agent may have adverse clinical effects not observed prior to this trial.69

TACTICS-TIMI 18. Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost with Invasive or Conservative Strategy (TACTICS-TIMI 18) was an international, multicenter, randomized trial to evaluate an early invasive strategy (catheterization between 4 and 48 hours with revascularization for suitable coronary anatomy) versus an early conservative or “selective invasive” strategy (catheterization for refractory angina, hemodynamic instability, marked exercise test abnormality, new MI or rehospitalization for UA, and clinical class III or IV angina with positive exercise test findings) in patients with non-ST segment elevation ACS. The 2,220 patients enrolled in TACTICS-TIMI 18 were initially administered aspirin, heparin and tirofiban “upstream” prior to coronary angiography. The primary endpoint was the composite of death, nonfatal MI and rehospitalization for ACS at 6 months following enrollment.70


Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.